Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Beard v. Beard" by Supreme Court Of California In Bank ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Beard v. Beard

๐Ÿ“˜ Read Now     ๐Ÿ“ฅ Download


eBook details

  • Title: Beard v. Beard
  • Author : Supreme Court Of California In Bank
  • Release Date : January 28, 1940
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 51 KB

Description

TRAYNOR, J. Respondent brought suit against appellant in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County on a judgment for payment of alimony secured in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon. Appellant filed a cross-complaint alleging that the original alimony decree had been entered pursuant to a stipulation between the parties calling for payments for a period of only two years and that such payments had been made, and asking for a determination of his rights and duties under the stipulation and original judgment. The cross-complaint was duly served on respondents attorney but respondent failed to file an answer. The court entered a default judgment declaring that appellant was "entitled to a satisfaction of said [prior] judgment and a release from further liability thereunder." When respondents original cause came on for trial the appellant set up the judgment on the cross-complaint in defense and was sustained by the court. At this time the attorney for the respondent stated as his reason for failing to answer the cross-complaint: "You cannot file an answer to a complaint for declaratory relief", whereupon he was informed of his error by the court. Respondent then filed a motion to set aside the default judgment because of inadvertence, mistake and excusable neglect under Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, alleging that continued negotiations between respondent and appellant for a settlement of their claims out of court had lulled the attorney for the respondent into a sense of security by reason of which he failed to file an answer to the cross-complaint. Accompanying the motion was an affidavit by the respondents attorney to the effect that the respondent had a good defense to the cross-complaint and appended thereto was a proposed answer to the cross-complaint verified by the respondents attorney. The court granted the motion to set aside the default judgment. The appellant has appealed from the order granting this motion.


Free Download "Beard v. Beard" PDF ePub Kindle